Fuzz testing (fuzzing) is a powerful technique for generating large numbers of diverse inputs - either randomly or algorithmically - and dynamically invoking the code with those inputs. Even with random inputs, it is often capable of generating unexpected results such as crashes, memory corruption, or resource consumption. Fuzzing effectively produces repeatable test cases that clearly indicate bugs, which helps developers to diagnose the issues.
Misinterpretation of Input
This vulnerability occurs when software incorrectly interprets or processes input data, leading to unintended and potentially harmful security consequences. The flawed interpretation can come from…
What is CWE-115?
Real-world CVEs caused by CWE-115
-
Product sees dangerous file extension in free text of a group discussion, disconnects all users.
-
Product does not correctly import and process security settings from another product.
Step-by-step attacker path
- 1
Identify a code path that handles untrusted input without validation.
- 2
Craft a payload that exercises the unsafe behavior — injection, traversal, overflow, or logic abuse.
- 3
Deliver the payload through a normal request and observe the application's reaction.
- 4
Iterate until the response leaks data, executes attacker code, or escalates privileges.
Vulnerable pseudo
MITRE has not published a code example for this CWE. The pattern below is illustrative — see Resources for canonical references.
// Example pattern — see MITRE for the canonical references.
function handleRequest(input) {
// Untrusted input flows directly into the sensitive sink.
return executeUnsafe(input);
} Secure pseudo
// Validate, sanitize, or use a safe API before reaching the sink.
function handleRequest(input) {
const safe = validateAndEscape(input);
return executeWithGuards(safe);
} How to prevent CWE-115
- Architecture Use safe-by-default frameworks and APIs that prevent the unsafe pattern from being expressible.
- Implementation Validate input at trust boundaries; use allowlists, not denylists.
- Implementation Apply the principle of least privilege to credentials, file paths, and runtime permissions.
- Testing Cover this weakness in CI: SAST rules + targeted unit tests for the data flow.
- Operation Monitor logs for the runtime signals listed in the next section.
How to detect CWE-115
Plexicus auto-detects CWE-115 and opens a fix PR in under 60 seconds.
Codex Remedium scans every commit, identifies this exact weakness, and ships a reviewer-ready pull request with the patch. No tickets. No hand-offs.
Frequently asked questions
What is CWE-115?
This vulnerability occurs when software incorrectly interprets or processes input data, leading to unintended and potentially harmful security consequences. The flawed interpretation can come from user-provided data, external systems, or other components.
How serious is CWE-115?
MITRE has not published a likelihood-of-exploit rating for this weakness. Treat it as medium-impact until your threat model proves otherwise.
What languages or platforms are affected by CWE-115?
MITRE has not specified affected platforms for this CWE — it can apply across most application stacks.
How can I prevent CWE-115?
Use safe-by-default frameworks, validate untrusted input at trust boundaries, and apply the principle of least privilege. Cover the data-flow signature in CI with SAST.
How does Plexicus detect and fix CWE-115?
Plexicus's SAST engine matches the data-flow signature for CWE-115 on every commit. When a match is found, our Codex Remedium agent opens a fix PR with the corrected code, tests, and a one-line summary for the reviewer.
Where can I learn more about CWE-115?
MITRE publishes the canonical definition at https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/115.html. You can also reference OWASP and NIST documentation for adjacent guidance.
Weaknesses related to CWE-115
Interpretation Conflict
An interpretation conflict occurs when two systems process the same data or sequence of events differently, leading one system to make…
Improper Neutralization of CRLF Sequences in HTTP Headers ('HTTP Request/Response Splitting')
This vulnerability occurs when an application accepts user-supplied data and includes it directly in HTTP headers without properly…
Incomplete Model of Endpoint Features
This vulnerability occurs when a security product, proxy, or monitoring system sits between endpoints but lacks a full understanding of…
Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests ('HTTP Request/Response Smuggling')
This weakness occurs when a proxy, firewall, or other intermediary HTTP agent interprets a malformed HTTP request or response differently…
Null Byte Interaction Error (Poison Null Byte)
This vulnerability occurs when software incorrectly processes null bytes (NUL characters) as data moves between different systems or…
Trusting HTTP Permission Methods on the Server Side
This vulnerability occurs when a server incorrectly assumes that HTTP GET requests are always safe and cannot change server-side data.…
Improper Neutralization of Invalid Characters in Identifiers in Web Pages
This vulnerability occurs when an application fails to properly filter or escape invalid characters within web identifiers like HTML tag…
Don't Let Security
Weigh You Down.
Stop choosing between AI velocity and security debt. Plexicus is the only platform that runs Vibe Coding Security and ASPM in parallel — one workflow, every codebase.