Run static analysis (SAST) on the codebase looking for the unsafe pattern in the data flow.
Weak Authentication
This vulnerability occurs when a system's login or identity verification process is too easy to bypass or fool. While it attempts to check who a user claims to be, the checks are insufficient,…
What is CWE-1390?
Real-world CVEs caused by CWE-1390
-
Chain: Web UI for a Python RPC framework does not use regex anchors to validate user login emails (CWE-777), potentially allowing bypass of OAuth (CWE-1390).
-
Chat application skips validation when Central Authentication Service (CAS) is enabled, effectively removing the second factor from two-factor authentication
-
Chain: Python-based HTTP Proxy server uses the wrong boolean operators (CWE-480) causing an incorrect comparison (CWE-697) that identifies an authN failure if all three conditions are met instead of only one, allowing bypass of the proxy authentication (CWE-1390)
-
Distributed Control System (DCS) uses a deterministic algorithm to generate utility passwords
-
Initialization file contains credentials that can be decoded using a "simple string transformation"
-
UART interface for AI speaker uses empty password for root shell
Step-by-step attacker path
- 1
Identify a code path that handles untrusted input without validation.
- 2
Craft a payload that exercises the unsafe behavior — injection, traversal, overflow, or logic abuse.
- 3
Deliver the payload through a normal request and observe the application's reaction.
- 4
Iterate until the response leaks data, executes attacker code, or escalates privileges.
Vulnerable pseudo
MITRE has not published a code example for this CWE. The pattern below is illustrative — see Resources for canonical references.
// Example pattern — see MITRE for the canonical references.
function handleRequest(input) {
// Untrusted input flows directly into the sensitive sink.
return executeUnsafe(input);
} Secure pseudo
// Validate, sanitize, or use a safe API before reaching the sink.
function handleRequest(input) {
const safe = validateAndEscape(input);
return executeWithGuards(safe);
} How to prevent CWE-1390
- Architecture Use safe-by-default frameworks and APIs that prevent the unsafe pattern from being expressible.
- Implementation Validate input at trust boundaries; use allowlists, not denylists.
- Implementation Apply the principle of least privilege to credentials, file paths, and runtime permissions.
- Testing Cover this weakness in CI: SAST rules + targeted unit tests for the data flow.
- Operation Monitor logs for the runtime signals listed in the next section.
How to detect CWE-1390
Run dynamic application security testing against the live endpoint.
Watch runtime logs for unusual exception traces, malformed input, or authorization bypass attempts.
Code review: flag any new code that handles input from this surface without using the validated framework helpers.
Plexicus auto-detects CWE-1390 and opens a fix PR in under 60 seconds.
Codex Remedium scans every commit, identifies this exact weakness, and ships a reviewer-ready pull request with the patch. No tickets. No hand-offs.
Frequently asked questions
What is CWE-1390?
This vulnerability occurs when a system's login or identity verification process is too easy to bypass or fool. While it attempts to check who a user claims to be, the checks are insufficient, allowing attackers to impersonate legitimate users.
How serious is CWE-1390?
MITRE has not published a likelihood-of-exploit rating for this weakness. Treat it as medium-impact until your threat model proves otherwise.
What languages or platforms are affected by CWE-1390?
MITRE lists the following affected platforms: ICS/OT, Not Technology-Specific.
How can I prevent CWE-1390?
Use safe-by-default frameworks, validate untrusted input at trust boundaries, and apply the principle of least privilege. Cover the data-flow signature in CI with SAST.
How does Plexicus detect and fix CWE-1390?
Plexicus's SAST engine matches the data-flow signature for CWE-1390 on every commit. When a match is found, our Codex Remedium agent opens a fix PR with the corrected code, tests, and a one-line summary for the reviewer.
Where can I learn more about CWE-1390?
MITRE publishes the canonical definition at https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/1390.html. You can also reference OWASP and NIST documentation for adjacent guidance.
Weaknesses related to CWE-1390
Improper Authentication
Improper Authentication occurs when a system fails to properly verify a user's claimed identity, allowing access without sufficient proof…
Authentication Bypass by Spoofing
This weakness occurs when an application's authentication system can be tricked into accepting forged or manipulated credentials, allowing…
Authentication Bypass by Capture-replay
This vulnerability occurs when an attacker can intercept and record legitimate authentication traffic, then replay it later to gain…
Improper Certificate Validation
This vulnerability occurs when an application fails to properly verify the authenticity of a digital certificate, or performs the…
Missing Authentication for Critical Function
This vulnerability occurs when a software feature that performs a sensitive action or uses significant system resources does not verify…
Improper Restriction of Excessive Authentication Attempts
This vulnerability occurs when an application fails to properly limit how many times someone can attempt to log in or verify their…
Weak Password Requirements
This vulnerability occurs when an application fails to enforce strong password policies, making user accounts easier to compromise through…
Insufficiently Protected Credentials
This vulnerability occurs when an application handles sensitive credentials like passwords or API keys in an insecure way, making them…
Weak Password Recovery Mechanism for Forgotten Password
This vulnerability occurs when an application's password reset or recovery feature is poorly designed or implemented, allowing attackers…
Don't Let Security
Weigh You Down.
Stop choosing between AI velocity and security debt. Plexicus is the only platform that runs Vibe Coding Security and ASPM in parallel — one workflow, every codebase.