CWE-186 Base Draft

Overly Restrictive Regular Expression

This weakness occurs when a regular expression is too narrow, failing to detect all the dangerous or unexpected input values it was designed to catch.

Definition

What is CWE-186?

This weakness occurs when a regular expression is too narrow, failing to detect all the dangerous or unexpected input values it was designed to catch.
An overly restrictive regex doesn't match every input it should, creating a gap in your security checks. This isn't about the regex being computationally complex; it's about its logic being incomplete. For example, using /[0-8]/ to validate digits would miss the number '9', potentially allowing an unwanted value to slip through. The result is either false negatives (missing real threats) or false positives (blocking safe input), depending on whether the regex is used to allowlist or blocklist terms. As a developer, you must carefully review the intended scope of your validation. Test your regular expressions against the full range of both valid and malicious edge cases to ensure they capture everything relevant. This proactive testing helps close the gap between what you think your regex catches and what it actually allows or blocks in practice.
Real-world impact

Real-world CVEs caused by CWE-186

  • MIE. ".php.ns" bypasses ".php$" regexp but is still parsed as PHP by Apache. (manipulates an equivalence property under Apache)

How attackers exploit it

Step-by-step attacker path

  1. 1

    Identify a code path that handles untrusted input without validation.

  2. 2

    Craft a payload that exercises the unsafe behavior — injection, traversal, overflow, or logic abuse.

  3. 3

    Deliver the payload through a normal request and observe the application's reaction.

  4. 4

    Iterate until the response leaks data, executes attacker code, or escalates privileges.

Vulnerable code example

Vulnerable pseudo

MITRE has not published a code example for this CWE. The pattern below is illustrative — see Resources for canonical references.

Vulnerable pseudo
// Example pattern — see MITRE for the canonical references.
function handleRequest(input) {
  // Untrusted input flows directly into the sensitive sink.
  return executeUnsafe(input);
}
Secure code example

Secure pseudo

Secure pseudo
// Validate, sanitize, or use a safe API before reaching the sink.
function handleRequest(input) {
  const safe = validateAndEscape(input);
  return executeWithGuards(safe);
}
What changed: the unsafe sink is replaced (or the input is validated/escaped) so the same payload no longer triggers the weakness.
Prevention checklist

How to prevent CWE-186

  • Implementation Regular expressions can become error prone when defining a complex language even for those experienced in writing grammars. Determine if several smaller regular expressions simplify one large regular expression. Also, subject your regular expression to thorough testing techniques such as equivalence partitioning, boundary value analysis, and robustness. After testing and a reasonable confidence level is achieved, a regular expression may not be foolproof. If an exploit is allowed to slip through, then record the exploit and refactor your regular expression.
Detection signals

How to detect CWE-186

SAST High

Run static analysis (SAST) on the codebase looking for the unsafe pattern in the data flow.

DAST Moderate

Run dynamic application security testing against the live endpoint.

Runtime Moderate

Watch runtime logs for unusual exception traces, malformed input, or authorization bypass attempts.

Code review Moderate

Code review: flag any new code that handles input from this surface without using the validated framework helpers.

Plexicus auto-fix

Plexicus auto-detects CWE-186 and opens a fix PR in under 60 seconds.

Codex Remedium scans every commit, identifies this exact weakness, and ships a reviewer-ready pull request with the patch. No tickets. No hand-offs.

Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

What is CWE-186?

This weakness occurs when a regular expression is too narrow, failing to detect all the dangerous or unexpected input values it was designed to catch.

How serious is CWE-186?

MITRE has not published a likelihood-of-exploit rating for this weakness. Treat it as medium-impact until your threat model proves otherwise.

What languages or platforms are affected by CWE-186?

MITRE has not specified affected platforms for this CWE — it can apply across most application stacks.

How can I prevent CWE-186?

Regular expressions can become error prone when defining a complex language even for those experienced in writing grammars. Determine if several smaller regular expressions simplify one large regular expression. Also, subject your regular expression to thorough testing techniques such as equivalence partitioning, boundary value analysis, and robustness. After testing and a reasonable confidence level is achieved, a regular expression may not be foolproof. If an exploit is allowed to slip…

How does Plexicus detect and fix CWE-186?

Plexicus's SAST engine matches the data-flow signature for CWE-186 on every commit. When a match is found, our Codex Remedium agent opens a fix PR with the corrected code, tests, and a one-line summary for the reviewer.

Where can I learn more about CWE-186?

MITRE publishes the canonical definition at https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/186.html. You can also reference OWASP and NIST documentation for adjacent guidance.

Ready when you are

Don't Let Security
Weigh You Down.

Stop choosing between AI velocity and security debt. Plexicus is the only platform that runs Vibe Coding Security and ASPM in parallel — one workflow, every codebase.