CWE-491 Variant Draft

Public cloneable() Method Without Final ('Object Hijack')

This vulnerability occurs when a class implements a public clone() method without declaring it final. This allows attackers to create copies of objects without invoking their constructors,…

Definition

What is CWE-491?

This vulnerability occurs when a class implements a public clone() method without declaring it final. This allows attackers to create copies of objects without invoking their constructors, potentially leaving the cloned object in an inconsistent or insecure state.
When a clone() method isn't marked final, subclasses can override it and bypass the original class's intended construction logic. This object hijacking technique lets an attacker create instances that skip critical initialization steps like security checks, resource allocation, or state validation, leading to unexpected behavior or security flaws. To prevent this, always declare the clone() method as final in security-sensitive classes, or consider alternative object creation patterns like copy constructors or factory methods. This ensures that object duplication follows a controlled path and maintains the object's integrity, preventing attackers from manipulating the cloning process to create malicious or unstable instances.
Real-world impact

Real-world CVEs caused by CWE-491

No public CVE references are linked to this CWE in MITRE's catalog yet.

How attackers exploit it

Step-by-step attacker path

  1. 1

    Identify a code path that handles untrusted input without validation.

  2. 2

    Craft a payload that exercises the unsafe behavior — injection, traversal, overflow, or logic abuse.

  3. 3

    Deliver the payload through a normal request and observe the application's reaction.

  4. 4

    Iterate until the response leaks data, executes attacker code, or escalates privileges.

Vulnerable code example

Vulnerable Java

In this example, a public class "BankAccount" implements the cloneable() method which declares "Object clone(string accountnumber)":

Vulnerable Java 
public class BankAccount implements Cloneable{
  		public Object clone(String accountnumber) throws
  		CloneNotSupportedException
  		{
  				Object returnMe = new BankAccount(account number);
  				...
  		}
  }
Secure code example

Secure pseudo

Secure pseudo 
// Validate, sanitize, or use a safe API before reaching the sink.
function handleRequest(input) {
  const safe = validateAndEscape(input);
  return executeWithGuards(safe);
}
What changed: the unsafe sink is replaced (or the input is validated/escaped) so the same payload no longer triggers the weakness.
Prevention checklist

How to prevent CWE-491

  • Implementation Make the cloneable() method final.
Detection signals

How to detect CWE-491

SAST High

Run static analysis (SAST) on the codebase looking for the unsafe pattern in the data flow.

DAST Moderate

Run dynamic application security testing against the live endpoint.

Runtime Moderate

Watch runtime logs for unusual exception traces, malformed input, or authorization bypass attempts.

Code review Moderate

Code review: flag any new code that handles input from this surface without using the validated framework helpers.

Plexicus auto-fix

Plexicus auto-detects CWE-491 and opens a fix PR in under 60 seconds.

Codex Remedium scans every commit, identifies this exact weakness, and ships a reviewer-ready pull request with the patch. No tickets. No hand-offs.

Get a demo Try Plexicus free
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

What is CWE-491?

This vulnerability occurs when a class implements a public clone() method without declaring it final. This allows attackers to create copies of objects without invoking their constructors, potentially leaving the cloned object in an inconsistent or insecure state.

How serious is CWE-491?

MITRE has not published a likelihood-of-exploit rating for this weakness. Treat it as medium-impact until your threat model proves otherwise.

What languages or platforms are affected by CWE-491?

MITRE lists the following affected platforms: Java.

How can I prevent CWE-491?

Make the cloneable() method final.

How does Plexicus detect and fix CWE-491?

Plexicus's SAST engine matches the data-flow signature for CWE-491 on every commit. When a match is found, our Codex Remedium agent opens a fix PR with the corrected code, tests, and a one-line summary for the reviewer.

Where can I learn more about CWE-491?

MITRE publishes the canonical definition at https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/491.html. You can also reference OWASP and NIST documentation for adjacent guidance.

Related weaknesses

Weaknesses related to CWE-491

CWE-668 Parent

Exposure of Resource to Wrong Sphere

This vulnerability occurs when an application unintentionally makes a resource accessible to users or systems that should not have…

CWE-1189 Sibling

Improper Isolation of Shared Resources on System-on-a-Chip (SoC)

This vulnerability occurs when a System-on-a-Chip (SoC) fails to properly separate shared hardware resources between secure (trusted) and…

CWE-1282 Sibling

Assumed-Immutable Data is Stored in Writable Memory

This vulnerability occurs when data that should be permanent and unchangeable—like a bootloader, device IDs, or one-time configuration…

CWE-1327 Sibling

Binding to an Unrestricted IP Address

This vulnerability occurs when software or a service is configured to bind to the IP address 0.0.0.0 (or :: in IPv6), which acts as a…

CWE-1331 Sibling

Improper Isolation of Shared Resources in Network On Chip (NoC)

This vulnerability occurs when a Network on Chip (NoC) fails to properly separate its internal, shared resources—like buffers, switches,…

CWE-134 Sibling

Use of Externally-Controlled Format String

This vulnerability occurs when a program uses a format string from an untrusted, external source (like user input, a network packet, or a…

CWE-200 Sibling

Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor

This weakness occurs when an application unintentionally reveals sensitive data to someone who shouldn't have access to it.

CWE-374 Sibling

Passing Mutable Objects to an Untrusted Method

This vulnerability occurs when a function receives a direct reference to mutable data, such as an object or array, instead of a safe copy…

CWE-375 Sibling

Returning a Mutable Object to an Untrusted Caller

This vulnerability occurs when a method directly returns a reference to its internal mutable data, allowing untrusted calling code to…

Resources

Further reading

Ready when you are

Don't Let Security
Weigh You Down.

Stop choosing between AI velocity and security debt. Plexicus is the only platform that runs Vibe Coding Security and ASPM in parallel — one workflow, every codebase.

Get started free Book a demo