CWE-498 Variant Draft Medium likelihood

Cloneable Class Containing Sensitive Information

This vulnerability occurs when a class containing sensitive information, such as credentials or personal data, is made cloneable. Attackers can bypass normal initialization and access the sensitive…

Definition

What is CWE-498?

This vulnerability occurs when a class containing sensitive information, such as credentials or personal data, is made cloneable. Attackers can bypass normal initialization and access the sensitive data by creating a copy of the object.
When a class implements the Cloneable interface without proper safeguards, it effectively becomes an open book. The clone() method can create copies of the object without calling its constructor, allowing any other class in the application to duplicate instances and directly access their internal, sensitive fields. This bypasses any security checks or initialization logic you might have placed in the constructor. To prevent this, you should explicitly deny cloning for classes that handle sensitive data. You can achieve this by declaring a clone() method that throws a CloneNotSupportedException. This simple step ensures your object's internal state remains controlled and prevents unintended data exposure through object duplication.
Real-world impact

Real-world CVEs caused by CWE-498

No public CVE references are linked to this CWE in MITRE's catalog yet.

How attackers exploit it

Step-by-step attacker path

  1. 1

    Identify a code path that handles untrusted input without validation.

  2. 2

    Craft a payload that exercises the unsafe behavior — injection, traversal, overflow, or logic abuse.

  3. 3

    Deliver the payload through a normal request and observe the application's reaction.

  4. 4

    Iterate until the response leaks data, executes attacker code, or escalates privileges.

Vulnerable code example

Vulnerable Java

The following example demonstrates the weakness.

Vulnerable Java
public class CloneClient {
  		public CloneClient() //throws
  		java.lang.CloneNotSupportedException {
  				Teacher t1 = new Teacher("guddu","22,nagar road");
  				//...
  				// Do some stuff to remove the teacher.
  				Teacher t2 = (Teacher)t1.clone();
  				System.out.println(t2.name);
  		}
  		public static void main(String args[]) {
  				new CloneClient();
  		}
  }
  class Teacher implements Cloneable {
  		public Object clone() {
  				try {
  					return super.clone();
  				}
  				catch (java.lang.CloneNotSupportedException e) {
  						throw new RuntimeException(e.toString());
  				}
  		}
  		public String name;
  		public String clas;
  		public Teacher(String name,String clas) {
  				this.name = name;
  				this.clas = clas;
  		}
  }
Secure code example

Secure Java

Make classes uncloneable by defining a clone function like:

Secure Java
public final void clone() throws java.lang.CloneNotSupportedException {
  	throw new java.lang.CloneNotSupportedException();
  }
What changed: the unsafe sink is replaced (or the input is validated/escaped) so the same payload no longer triggers the weakness.
Prevention checklist

How to prevent CWE-498

  • Implementation If you do make your classes clonable, ensure that your clone method is final and throw super.clone().
Detection signals

How to detect CWE-498

SAST High

Run static analysis (SAST) on the codebase looking for the unsafe pattern in the data flow.

DAST Moderate

Run dynamic application security testing against the live endpoint.

Runtime Moderate

Watch runtime logs for unusual exception traces, malformed input, or authorization bypass attempts.

Code review Moderate

Code review: flag any new code that handles input from this surface without using the validated framework helpers.

Plexicus auto-fix

Plexicus auto-detects CWE-498 and opens a fix PR in under 60 seconds.

Codex Remedium scans every commit, identifies this exact weakness, and ships a reviewer-ready pull request with the patch. No tickets. No hand-offs.

Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

What is CWE-498?

This vulnerability occurs when a class containing sensitive information, such as credentials or personal data, is made cloneable. Attackers can bypass normal initialization and access the sensitive data by creating a copy of the object.

How serious is CWE-498?

MITRE rates the likelihood of exploit as Medium — exploitation is realistic but typically requires specific conditions.

What languages or platforms are affected by CWE-498?

MITRE lists the following affected platforms: C++, Java, C#.

How can I prevent CWE-498?

If you do make your classes clonable, ensure that your clone method is final and throw super.clone().

How does Plexicus detect and fix CWE-498?

Plexicus's SAST engine matches the data-flow signature for CWE-498 on every commit. When a match is found, our Codex Remedium agent opens a fix PR with the corrected code, tests, and a one-line summary for the reviewer.

Where can I learn more about CWE-498?

MITRE publishes the canonical definition at https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/498.html. You can also reference OWASP and NIST documentation for adjacent guidance.

Related weaknesses

Weaknesses related to CWE-498

CWE-668 Parent

Exposure of Resource to Wrong Sphere

This vulnerability occurs when an application unintentionally makes a resource accessible to users or systems that should not have…

CWE-1189 Sibling

Improper Isolation of Shared Resources on System-on-a-Chip (SoC)

This vulnerability occurs when a System-on-a-Chip (SoC) fails to properly separate shared hardware resources between secure (trusted) and…

CWE-1282 Sibling

Assumed-Immutable Data is Stored in Writable Memory

This vulnerability occurs when data that should be permanent and unchangeable—like a bootloader, device IDs, or one-time configuration…

CWE-1327 Sibling

Binding to an Unrestricted IP Address

This vulnerability occurs when software or a service is configured to bind to the IP address 0.0.0.0 (or :: in IPv6), which acts as a…

CWE-1331 Sibling

Improper Isolation of Shared Resources in Network On Chip (NoC)

This vulnerability occurs when a Network on Chip (NoC) fails to properly separate its internal, shared resources—like buffers, switches,…

CWE-134 Sibling

Use of Externally-Controlled Format String

This vulnerability occurs when a program uses a format string from an untrusted, external source (like user input, a network packet, or a…

CWE-200 Sibling

Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor

This weakness occurs when an application unintentionally reveals sensitive data to someone who shouldn't have access to it.

CWE-374 Sibling

Passing Mutable Objects to an Untrusted Method

This vulnerability occurs when a function receives a direct reference to mutable data, such as an object or array, instead of a safe copy…

CWE-375 Sibling

Returning a Mutable Object to an Untrusted Caller

This vulnerability occurs when a method directly returns a reference to its internal mutable data, allowing untrusted calling code to…

Ready when you are

Don't Let Security
Weigh You Down.

Stop choosing between AI velocity and security debt. Plexicus is the only platform that runs Vibe Coding Security and ASPM in parallel — one workflow, every codebase.