Run static analysis (SAST) on the codebase looking for the unsafe pattern in the data flow.
Use of a Non-reentrant Function in a Concurrent Context
This vulnerability occurs when a program uses a function that is not safe for reentrancy within a concurrent environment, such as multi-threaded code or signal handlers. If another thread or signal…
What is CWE-663?
Real-world CVEs caused by CWE-663
-
unsafe calls to library functions from signal handler
-
SIGCHLD signal to FTP server can cause crash under heavy load while executing non-reentrant functions like malloc/free.
Step-by-step attacker path
- 1
Identify a code path that handles untrusted input without validation.
- 2
Craft a payload that exercises the unsafe behavior — injection, traversal, overflow, or logic abuse.
- 3
Deliver the payload through a normal request and observe the application's reaction.
- 4
Iterate until the response leaks data, executes attacker code, or escalates privileges.
Vulnerable C
In this example, a signal handler uses syslog() to log a message:
char *message;
void sh(int dummy) {
syslog(LOG_NOTICE,"%s\n",message);
sleep(10);
exit(0);
}
int main(int argc,char* argv[]) {
...
signal(SIGHUP,sh);
signal(SIGTERM,sh);
sleep(10);
exit(0);
}
If the execution of the first call to the signal handler is suspended after invoking syslog(), and the signal handler is called a second time, the memory allocated by syslog() enters an undefined, and possibly, exploitable state. Secure pseudo
// Validate, sanitize, or use a safe API before reaching the sink.
function handleRequest(input) {
const safe = validateAndEscape(input);
return executeWithGuards(safe);
} How to prevent CWE-663
- Implementation Use reentrant functions if available.
- Implementation Add synchronization to your non-reentrant function.
- Implementation In Java, use the ReentrantLock Class.
How to detect CWE-663
Run dynamic application security testing against the live endpoint.
Watch runtime logs for unusual exception traces, malformed input, or authorization bypass attempts.
Code review: flag any new code that handles input from this surface without using the validated framework helpers.
Plexicus auto-detects CWE-663 and opens a fix PR in under 60 seconds.
Codex Remedium scans every commit, identifies this exact weakness, and ships a reviewer-ready pull request with the patch. No tickets. No hand-offs.
Frequently asked questions
What is CWE-663?
This vulnerability occurs when a program uses a function that is not safe for reentrancy within a concurrent environment, such as multi-threaded code or signal handlers. If another thread or signal handler interrupts and calls the same function, it can corrupt shared data, cause crashes, or create unpredictable behavior.
How serious is CWE-663?
MITRE has not published a likelihood-of-exploit rating for this weakness. Treat it as medium-impact until your threat model proves otherwise.
What languages or platforms are affected by CWE-663?
MITRE has not specified affected platforms for this CWE — it can apply across most application stacks.
How can I prevent CWE-663?
Use reentrant functions if available. Add synchronization to your non-reentrant function.
How does Plexicus detect and fix CWE-663?
Plexicus's SAST engine matches the data-flow signature for CWE-663 on every commit. When a match is found, our Codex Remedium agent opens a fix PR with the corrected code, tests, and a one-line summary for the reviewer.
Where can I learn more about CWE-663?
MITRE publishes the canonical definition at https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/663.html. You can also reference OWASP and NIST documentation for adjacent guidance.
Weaknesses related to CWE-663
Improper Synchronization
This vulnerability occurs when a multi-threaded or multi-process application allows shared resources to be accessed by multiple threads or…
Invokable Control Element in Multi-Thread Context with non-Final Static Storable or Member Element
This happens when a method or function, designed to run in a multi-threaded environment, accesses or modifies a non-final static variable…
Singleton Class Instance Creation without Proper Locking or Synchronization
This flaw occurs when a Singleton class is implemented without proper thread-safe controls, allowing multiple instances to be created in…
Race Condition within a Thread
This vulnerability occurs when two or more threads within the same application access and manipulate a shared resource (like a variable,…
Use of Singleton Pattern Without Synchronization in a Multithreaded Context
This vulnerability occurs when a singleton pattern is implemented in a multithreaded application without proper synchronization,…
Unsynchronized Access to Shared Data in a Multithreaded Context
This vulnerability occurs when multiple threads in an application can read and modify shared data, like static variables, without proper…
Improper Locking
This vulnerability occurs when a program fails to correctly acquire or release a lock on a shared resource, such as a file, database…
Multiple Locks of a Critical Resource
This vulnerability occurs when a critical resource, such as a file, data structure, or connection, is locked more times than the software…
Missing Synchronization
This vulnerability occurs when multiple parts of your application (like threads or processes) use the same resource—such as a variable,…
Don't Let Security
Weigh You Down.
Stop choosing between AI velocity and security debt. Plexicus is the only platform that runs Vibe Coding Security and ASPM in parallel — one workflow, every codebase.