CWE-663 Base Draft

Use of a Non-reentrant Function in a Concurrent Context

This vulnerability occurs when a program uses a function that is not safe for reentrancy within a concurrent environment, such as multi-threaded code or signal handlers. If another thread or signal…

Definition

What is CWE-663?

This vulnerability occurs when a program uses a function that is not safe for reentrancy within a concurrent environment, such as multi-threaded code or signal handlers. If another thread or signal handler interrupts and calls the same function, it can corrupt shared data, cause crashes, or create unpredictable behavior.
Non-reentrant functions rely on or modify shared global or static data, making them unsafe when multiple execution flows can interrupt each other. In a concurrent context—like a multi-threaded application or a program using signal handlers—if one thread is inside such a function and another thread or signal handler calls the same function, the shared state can be corrupted. This leads to race conditions, memory corruption, or incorrect program outputs, often manifesting as intermittent, hard-to-debug failures. To prevent this, developers should identify functions not designed for concurrency (like many traditional C library functions) and protect their use with proper synchronization mechanisms, such as mutexes or semaphores. Alternatively, replace them with thread-safe, reentrant equivalents (often denoted with '_r' suffixes in C). Always audit code for global/static variable usage within functions that may be accessed by multiple threads or signal handlers, and design concurrent systems with clear ownership of shared resources.
Real-world impact

Real-world CVEs caused by CWE-663

  • unsafe calls to library functions from signal handler

  • SIGCHLD signal to FTP server can cause crash under heavy load while executing non-reentrant functions like malloc/free.

How attackers exploit it

Step-by-step attacker path

  1. 1

    Identify a code path that handles untrusted input without validation.

  2. 2

    Craft a payload that exercises the unsafe behavior — injection, traversal, overflow, or logic abuse.

  3. 3

    Deliver the payload through a normal request and observe the application's reaction.

  4. 4

    Iterate until the response leaks data, executes attacker code, or escalates privileges.

Vulnerable code example

Vulnerable C

In this example, a signal handler uses syslog() to log a message:

Vulnerable C
char *message;
  void sh(int dummy) {
  	syslog(LOG_NOTICE,"%s\n",message);
  	sleep(10);
  	exit(0);
  }
  int main(int argc,char* argv[]) {
  	...
  	signal(SIGHUP,sh);
  	signal(SIGTERM,sh);
  	sleep(10);
  	exit(0);
  }
  	If the execution of the first call to the signal handler is suspended after invoking syslog(), and the signal handler is called a second time, the memory allocated by syslog() enters an undefined, and possibly, exploitable state.
Secure code example

Secure pseudo

Secure pseudo
// Validate, sanitize, or use a safe API before reaching the sink.
function handleRequest(input) {
  const safe = validateAndEscape(input);
  return executeWithGuards(safe);
}
What changed: the unsafe sink is replaced (or the input is validated/escaped) so the same payload no longer triggers the weakness.
Prevention checklist

How to prevent CWE-663

  • Implementation Use reentrant functions if available.
  • Implementation Add synchronization to your non-reentrant function.
  • Implementation In Java, use the ReentrantLock Class.
Detection signals

How to detect CWE-663

SAST High

Run static analysis (SAST) on the codebase looking for the unsafe pattern in the data flow.

DAST Moderate

Run dynamic application security testing against the live endpoint.

Runtime Moderate

Watch runtime logs for unusual exception traces, malformed input, or authorization bypass attempts.

Code review Moderate

Code review: flag any new code that handles input from this surface without using the validated framework helpers.

Plexicus auto-fix

Plexicus auto-detects CWE-663 and opens a fix PR in under 60 seconds.

Codex Remedium scans every commit, identifies this exact weakness, and ships a reviewer-ready pull request with the patch. No tickets. No hand-offs.

Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

What is CWE-663?

This vulnerability occurs when a program uses a function that is not safe for reentrancy within a concurrent environment, such as multi-threaded code or signal handlers. If another thread or signal handler interrupts and calls the same function, it can corrupt shared data, cause crashes, or create unpredictable behavior.

How serious is CWE-663?

MITRE has not published a likelihood-of-exploit rating for this weakness. Treat it as medium-impact until your threat model proves otherwise.

What languages or platforms are affected by CWE-663?

MITRE has not specified affected platforms for this CWE — it can apply across most application stacks.

How can I prevent CWE-663?

Use reentrant functions if available. Add synchronization to your non-reentrant function.

How does Plexicus detect and fix CWE-663?

Plexicus's SAST engine matches the data-flow signature for CWE-663 on every commit. When a match is found, our Codex Remedium agent opens a fix PR with the corrected code, tests, and a one-line summary for the reviewer.

Where can I learn more about CWE-663?

MITRE publishes the canonical definition at https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/663.html. You can also reference OWASP and NIST documentation for adjacent guidance.

Related weaknesses

Weaknesses related to CWE-663

CWE-662 Parent

Improper Synchronization

This vulnerability occurs when a multi-threaded or multi-process application allows shared resources to be accessed by multiple threads or…

CWE-1058 Sibling

Invokable Control Element in Multi-Thread Context with non-Final Static Storable or Member Element

This happens when a method or function, designed to run in a multi-threaded environment, accesses or modifies a non-final static variable…

CWE-1096 Sibling

Singleton Class Instance Creation without Proper Locking or Synchronization

This flaw occurs when a Singleton class is implemented without proper thread-safe controls, allowing multiple instances to be created in…

CWE-366 Sibling

Race Condition within a Thread

This vulnerability occurs when two or more threads within the same application access and manipulate a shared resource (like a variable,…

CWE-543 Sibling

Use of Singleton Pattern Without Synchronization in a Multithreaded Context

This vulnerability occurs when a singleton pattern is implemented in a multithreaded application without proper synchronization,…

CWE-567 Sibling

Unsynchronized Access to Shared Data in a Multithreaded Context

This vulnerability occurs when multiple threads in an application can read and modify shared data, like static variables, without proper…

CWE-667 Sibling

Improper Locking

This vulnerability occurs when a program fails to correctly acquire or release a lock on a shared resource, such as a file, database…

CWE-764 Sibling

Multiple Locks of a Critical Resource

This vulnerability occurs when a critical resource, such as a file, data structure, or connection, is locked more times than the software…

CWE-820 Sibling

Missing Synchronization

This vulnerability occurs when multiple parts of your application (like threads or processes) use the same resource—such as a variable,…

Ready when you are

Don't Let Security
Weigh You Down.

Stop choosing between AI velocity and security debt. Plexicus is the only platform that runs Vibe Coding Security and ASPM in parallel — one workflow, every codebase.