CWE-1274 Base Stable

Improper Access Control for Volatile Memory Containing Boot Code

This vulnerability occurs when a system's secure-boot process loads bootloader code into volatile memory (like DRAM or SRAM) but fails to properly lock down that memory region afterward. Without…

Definition

What is CWE-1274?

This vulnerability occurs when a system's secure-boot process loads bootloader code into volatile memory (like DRAM or SRAM) but fails to properly lock down that memory region afterward. Without strong access controls, an attacker can modify the boot code in memory, bypassing secure boot and running malicious software.
During a secure boot, the initial read-only memory (ROM) code inside a chip fetches the bootloader from external, non-volatile storage and copies it into internal volatile memory for execution. This code is authenticated as it's loaded. However, if the chip's memory protection unit (MPU) or similar hardware mechanisms don't enforce strict write or execute permissions on this volatile memory region after the transfer, the authenticated code becomes a sitting target. An attacker with physical or software access can then overwrite this now-unprotected boot code in volatile memory. This allows them to subvert the entire secure-boot chain, replacing the trusted bootloader with their own malicious payload before the system's main processor executes it, completely undermining the device's security foundation.
Real-world impact

Real-world CVEs caused by CWE-1274

  • Locked memory regions may be modified through other interfaces in a secure-boot-loader image due to improper access control.

How attackers exploit it

Step-by-step attacker path

  1. 1

    Identify a code path that handles untrusted input without validation.

  2. 2

    Craft a payload that exercises the unsafe behavior — injection, traversal, overflow, or logic abuse.

  3. 3

    Deliver the payload through a normal request and observe the application's reaction.

  4. 4

    Iterate until the response leaks data, executes attacker code, or escalates privileges.

Vulnerable code example

Vulnerable Other

A typical SoC secure boot's flow includes fetching the next piece of code (i.e., the boot loader) from NVM (e.g., serial, peripheral interface (SPI) flash), and transferring it to DRAM/SRAM volatile, internal memory, which is more efficient.

Vulnerable Other
The volatile-memory protections or access controls are insufficient.
Secure code example

Secure Other

The memory from where the boot loader executes can be modified by an adversary.

Secure Other
A good architecture should define appropriate protections or access controls to prevent modification by an adversary or untrusted agent, once the bootloader is authenticated.
What changed: the unsafe sink is replaced (or the input is validated/escaped) so the same payload no longer triggers the weakness.
Prevention checklist

How to prevent CWE-1274

  • Architecture and Design Ensure that the design of volatile-memory protections is enough to prevent modification from an adversary or untrusted code.
  • Testing Test the volatile-memory protections to ensure they are safe from modification or untrusted code.
Detection signals

How to detect CWE-1274

Manual Analysis High

Ensure the volatile memory is lockable or has locks. Ensure the volatile memory is locked for writes from untrusted agents or adversaries. Try modifying the volatile memory from an untrusted agent, and ensure these writes are dropped.

Manual Analysis Moderate

Analyze the device using the following steps: 1. Identify all fabric master agents that are active during system Boot Flow when initial code is loaded from Non-volatile storage to volatile memory. 1. Identify the volatile memory regions that are used for storing loaded system executable program. 1. During system boot, test programming the identified memory regions in step 2 from all the masters identified in step 1. Only trusted masters should be allowed to write to the memory regions. For example, pluggable device peripherals should not have write access to program load memory regions.

Plexicus auto-fix

Plexicus auto-detects CWE-1274 and opens a fix PR in under 60 seconds.

Codex Remedium scans every commit, identifies this exact weakness, and ships a reviewer-ready pull request with the patch. No tickets. No hand-offs.

Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

What is CWE-1274?

This vulnerability occurs when a system's secure-boot process loads bootloader code into volatile memory (like DRAM or SRAM) but fails to properly lock down that memory region afterward. Without strong access controls, an attacker can modify the boot code in memory, bypassing secure boot and running malicious software.

How serious is CWE-1274?

MITRE has not published a likelihood-of-exploit rating for this weakness. Treat it as medium-impact until your threat model proves otherwise.

What languages or platforms are affected by CWE-1274?

MITRE lists the following affected platforms: Not OS-Specific, Not Architecture-Specific, Not Technology-Specific.

How can I prevent CWE-1274?

Ensure that the design of volatile-memory protections is enough to prevent modification from an adversary or untrusted code. Test the volatile-memory protections to ensure they are safe from modification or untrusted code.

How does Plexicus detect and fix CWE-1274?

Plexicus's SAST engine matches the data-flow signature for CWE-1274 on every commit. When a match is found, our Codex Remedium agent opens a fix PR with the corrected code, tests, and a one-line summary for the reviewer.

Where can I learn more about CWE-1274?

MITRE publishes the canonical definition at https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/1274.html. You can also reference OWASP and NIST documentation for adjacent guidance.

Related weaknesses

Weaknesses related to CWE-1274

CWE-284 Parent

Improper Access Control

The software fails to properly limit who can access a resource, allowing unauthorized users or systems to interact with it.

CWE-1191 Sibling

On-Chip Debug and Test Interface With Improper Access Control

This vulnerability occurs when a hardware chip's debug or test interface (like JTAG) lacks proper access controls. Without correct…

CWE-1220 Sibling

Insufficient Granularity of Access Control

This vulnerability occurs when a system's access controls are too broad, allowing unauthorized users or processes to read or modify…

CWE-1224 Sibling

Improper Restriction of Write-Once Bit Fields

This vulnerability occurs when hardware write-once protection mechanisms, often called 'sticky bits,' are incorrectly implemented,…

CWE-1231 Sibling

Improper Prevention of Lock Bit Modification

This vulnerability occurs when hardware or firmware uses a lock bit to protect critical system registers or memory regions, but fails to…

CWE-1233 Sibling

Security-Sensitive Hardware Controls with Missing Lock Bit Protection

This vulnerability occurs when a hardware device uses a lock bit to protect critical configuration registers, but the lock fails to…

CWE-1252 Sibling

CPU Hardware Not Configured to Support Exclusivity of Write and Execute Operations

This vulnerability occurs when a CPU's hardware is not set up to enforce a strict separation between writing data to memory and executing…

CWE-1257 Sibling

Improper Access Control Applied to Mirrored or Aliased Memory Regions

This vulnerability occurs when a hardware design maps the same physical memory to multiple addresses (aliasing or mirroring) but fails to…

CWE-1259 Sibling

Improper Restriction of Security Token Assignment

This vulnerability occurs when a System-on-a-Chip (SoC) fails to properly secure its Security Token mechanism. These tokens control which…

Ready when you are

Don't Let Security
Weigh You Down.

Stop choosing between AI velocity and security debt. Plexicus is the only platform that runs Vibe Coding Security and ASPM in parallel — one workflow, every codebase.