CWE-1391 Class Incomplete

Use of Weak Credentials

This vulnerability occurs when a system relies on weak authentication credentials—like default passwords, hard-coded keys, or easily guessable values—that an attacker can deduce, reuse, or predict…

Definition

What is CWE-1391?

This vulnerability occurs when a system relies on weak authentication credentials—like default passwords, hard-coded keys, or easily guessable values—that an attacker can deduce, reuse, or predict without needing to perform a full brute-force attack.
Authentication systems are designed to force attackers into time-consuming brute-force attempts when credentials are unknown. However, when credentials are weak—whether they are static, widely reused, or generated in a predictable pattern—attackers can bypass this protection entirely, gaining unauthorized access with minimal effort. Weak credentials typically fall into three categories: hard-coded (static and unchangeable), default (common across installations but changeable), or predictable (generated using a flawed or guessable method). Even if a unique credential is intended for each deployment, a predictable generation process can still make it vulnerable to efficient guessing attacks, undermining the entire authentication mechanism.
Real-world impact

Real-world CVEs caused by CWE-1391

  • [REF-1374]

    Chain: JavaScript-based cryptocurrency library can fall back to the insecure Math.random() function instead of reporting a failure (CWE-392), thus reducing the entropy (CWE-332) and leading to generation of non-unique cryptographic keys for Bitcoin wallets (CWE-1391)

  • CVE-2022-30270

    Remote Terminal Unit (RTU) uses default credentials for some SSH accounts

  • CVE-2022-29965

    Distributed Control System (DCS) uses a deterministic algorithm to generate utility passwords

  • CVE-2022-30271

    Remote Terminal Unit (RTU) uses a hard-coded SSH private key that is likely to be used in typical deployments

  • CVE-2021-38759

    microcontroller board has default password, allowing admin access

  • CVE-2021-41192

    data visualization/sharing package uses default secret keys or cookie values if they are not specified in environment variables

  • CVE-2020-8994

    UART interface for AI speaker uses empty password for root shell

  • CVE-2020-27020

    password manager does not generate cryptographically strong passwords, allowing prediction of passwords using guessable details such as time of generation

How attackers exploit it

Step-by-step attacker path

  1. 1

    Identify a code path that handles untrusted input without validation.

  2. 2

    Craft a payload that exercises the unsafe behavior — injection, traversal, overflow, or logic abuse.

  3. 3

    Deliver the payload through a normal request and observe the application's reaction.

  4. 4

    Iterate until the response leaks data, executes attacker code, or escalates privileges.

Vulnerable code example

Vulnerable pseudo

MITRE has not published a code example for this CWE. The pattern below is illustrative — see Resources for canonical references.

Vulnerable pseudo 
// Example pattern — see MITRE for the canonical references.
function handleRequest(input) {
  // Untrusted input flows directly into the sensitive sink.
  return executeUnsafe(input);
}
Secure code example

Secure pseudo

Secure pseudo 
// Validate, sanitize, or use a safe API before reaching the sink.
function handleRequest(input) {
  const safe = validateAndEscape(input);
  return executeWithGuards(safe);
}
What changed: the unsafe sink is replaced (or the input is validated/escaped) so the same payload no longer triggers the weakness.
Prevention checklist

How to prevent CWE-1391

  • Architecture Use safe-by-default frameworks and APIs that prevent the unsafe pattern from being expressible.
  • Implementation Validate input at trust boundaries; use allowlists, not denylists.
  • Implementation Apply the principle of least privilege to credentials, file paths, and runtime permissions.
  • Testing Cover this weakness in CI: SAST rules + targeted unit tests for the data flow.
  • Operation Monitor logs for the runtime signals listed in the next section.
Detection signals

How to detect CWE-1391

SAST High

Run static analysis (SAST) on the codebase looking for the unsafe pattern in the data flow.

DAST Moderate

Run dynamic application security testing against the live endpoint.

Runtime Moderate

Watch runtime logs for unusual exception traces, malformed input, or authorization bypass attempts.

Code review Moderate

Code review: flag any new code that handles input from this surface without using the validated framework helpers.

Plexicus auto-fix

Plexicus auto-detects CWE-1391 and opens a fix PR in under 60 seconds.

Codex Remedium scans every commit, identifies this exact weakness, and ships a reviewer-ready pull request with the patch. No tickets. No hand-offs.

Get a demo Try Plexicus free
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

What is CWE-1391?

This vulnerability occurs when a system relies on weak authentication credentials—like default passwords, hard-coded keys, or easily guessable values—that an attacker can deduce, reuse, or predict without needing to perform a full brute-force attack.

How serious is CWE-1391?

MITRE has not published a likelihood-of-exploit rating for this weakness. Treat it as medium-impact until your threat model proves otherwise.

What languages or platforms are affected by CWE-1391?

MITRE lists the following affected platforms: Not OS-Specific, Not Architecture-Specific, ICS/OT, Not Technology-Specific.

How can I prevent CWE-1391?

Use safe-by-default frameworks, validate untrusted input at trust boundaries, and apply the principle of least privilege. Cover the data-flow signature in CI with SAST.

How does Plexicus detect and fix CWE-1391?

Plexicus's SAST engine matches the data-flow signature for CWE-1391 on every commit. When a match is found, our Codex Remedium agent opens a fix PR with the corrected code, tests, and a one-line summary for the reviewer.

Where can I learn more about CWE-1391?

MITRE publishes the canonical definition at https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/1391.html. You can also reference OWASP and NIST documentation for adjacent guidance.

Related weaknesses

Weaknesses related to CWE-1391

CWE-1390 Parent

Weak Authentication

This vulnerability occurs when a system's login or identity verification process is too easy to bypass or fool. While it attempts to check…

CWE-262 Sibling

Not Using Password Aging

This vulnerability occurs when a system lacks password expiration policies, allowing users to keep the same password indefinitely.

CWE-263 Sibling

Password Aging with Long Expiration

The system enforces password changes, but the time allowed between changes is excessively long, weakening security.

CWE-289 Sibling

Authentication Bypass by Alternate Name

This vulnerability occurs when a system checks access based on a resource or user name, but fails to account for all the different names…

CWE-290 Sibling

Authentication Bypass by Spoofing

This weakness occurs when an application's authentication system can be tricked into accepting forged or manipulated credentials, allowing…

CWE-294 Sibling

Authentication Bypass by Capture-replay

This vulnerability occurs when an attacker can intercept and record legitimate authentication traffic, then replay it later to gain…

CWE-301 Sibling

Reflection Attack in an Authentication Protocol

A reflection attack is a flaw in mutual authentication protocols that allows an attacker to impersonate a legitimate user without knowing…

CWE-302 Sibling

Authentication Bypass by Assumed-Immutable Data

This vulnerability occurs when an authentication system incorrectly treats certain data as unchangeable, when in fact an attacker can…

CWE-303 Sibling

Incorrect Implementation of Authentication Algorithm

This weakness occurs when a developer implements a standard authentication algorithm, but makes critical mistakes in the code that cause…

Resources

Further reading

Ready when you are

Don't Let Security
Weigh You Down.

Stop choosing between AI velocity and security debt. Plexicus is the only platform that runs Vibe Coding Security and ASPM in parallel — one workflow, every codebase.

Get started free Book a demo