Automated static analysis, commonly referred to as Static Application Security Testing (SAST), can find some instances of this weakness by analyzing source code (or binary/compiled code) without having to execute it. Typically, this is done by building a model of data flow and control flow, then searching for potentially-vulnerable patterns that connect "sources" (origins of input) with "sinks" (destinations where the data interacts with external components, a lower layer such as the OS, etc.)
Improper Resource Locking
This vulnerability occurs when an application fails to properly lock a shared resource, such as a file or memory location, before performing operations that require exclusive access.
What is CWE-413?
Real-world CVEs caused by CWE-413
-
Chain: an operating system kernel has insufficent resource locking (CWE-413) leading to a use after free (CWE-416).
Step-by-step attacker path
- 1
The following function attempts to acquire a lock in order to perform operations on a shared resource.
- 2
However, the code does not check the value returned by pthread_mutex_lock() for errors. If pthread_mutex_lock() cannot acquire the mutex for any reason, the function may introduce a race condition into the program and result in undefined behavior.
- 3
In order to avoid data races, correctly written programs must check the result of thread synchronization functions and appropriately handle all errors, either by attempting to recover from them or reporting them to higher levels.
- 4
This Java example shows a simple BankAccount class with deposit and withdraw methods.
- 5
However, the deposit and withdraw methods have shared access to the account balance private class variable. This can result in a race condition if multiple threads attempt to call the deposit and withdraw methods simultaneously where the account balance is modified by one thread before another thread has completed modifying the account balance. For example, if a thread attempts to withdraw funds using the withdraw method before another thread that is depositing funds using the deposit method completes the deposit then there may not be sufficient funds for the withdraw transaction.
Vulnerable C
The following function attempts to acquire a lock in order to perform operations on a shared resource.
void f(pthread_mutex_t *mutex) {
pthread_mutex_lock(mutex);
```
/* access shared resource */*
pthread_mutex_unlock(mutex);} Secure C
In order to avoid data races, correctly written programs must check the result of thread synchronization functions and appropriately handle all errors, either by attempting to recover from them or reporting them to higher levels.
int f(pthread_mutex_t *mutex) {
int result;
result = pthread_mutex_lock(mutex);
if (0 != result)
return result;
```
/* access shared resource */*
return pthread_mutex_unlock(mutex);} How to prevent CWE-413
- Architecture and Design Use a non-conflicting privilege scheme.
- Architecture and Design / Implementation Use synchronization when locking a resource.
How to detect CWE-413
Plexicus auto-detects CWE-413 and opens a fix PR in under 60 seconds.
Codex Remedium scans every commit, identifies this exact weakness, and ships a reviewer-ready pull request with the patch. No tickets. No hand-offs.
Frequently asked questions
What is CWE-413?
This vulnerability occurs when an application fails to properly lock a shared resource, such as a file or memory location, before performing operations that require exclusive access.
How serious is CWE-413?
MITRE has not published a likelihood-of-exploit rating for this weakness. Treat it as medium-impact until your threat model proves otherwise.
What languages or platforms are affected by CWE-413?
MITRE has not specified affected platforms for this CWE — it can apply across most application stacks.
How can I prevent CWE-413?
Use a non-conflicting privilege scheme. Use synchronization when locking a resource.
How does Plexicus detect and fix CWE-413?
Plexicus's SAST engine matches the data-flow signature for CWE-413 on every commit. When a match is found, our Codex Remedium agent opens a fix PR with the corrected code, tests, and a one-line summary for the reviewer.
Where can I learn more about CWE-413?
MITRE publishes the canonical definition at https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/413.html. You can also reference OWASP and NIST documentation for adjacent guidance.
Weaknesses related to CWE-413
Improper Locking
This vulnerability occurs when a program fails to correctly acquire or release a lock on a shared resource, such as a file, database…
Improper Lock Behavior After Power State Transition
This vulnerability occurs when a hardware lock bit, designed to protect critical system configuration registers, is improperly reset or…
Security-Sensitive Hardware Controls with Missing Lock Bit Protection
This vulnerability occurs when a hardware device uses a lock bit to protect critical configuration registers, but the lock fails to…
Hardware Internal or Debug Modes Allow Override of Locks
Hardware debug modes or internal states can bypass critical system lock protections, allowing unauthorized changes to device configuration.
Unrestricted Externally Accessible Lock
This vulnerability occurs when a system correctly checks for a lock's existence, but an unauthorized external actor can control or…
Missing Lock Check
This vulnerability occurs when software fails to verify that a proper synchronization lock is active before accessing or modifying a…
Double-Checked Locking
Double-checked locking is an insufficient synchronization pattern where a program checks a resource's state, acquires a lock, and checks…
Multiple Locks of a Critical Resource
This vulnerability occurs when a critical resource, such as a file, data structure, or connection, is locked more times than the software…
Multiple Unlocks of a Critical Resource
This vulnerability occurs when a critical resource, like a lock or semaphore, is unlocked more times than it was locked, putting the…
Don't Let Security
Weigh You Down.
Stop choosing between AI velocity and security debt. Plexicus is the only platform that runs Vibe Coding Security and ASPM in parallel — one workflow, every codebase.