CWE-414 Base Draft

Missing Lock Check

This vulnerability occurs when software fails to verify that a proper synchronization lock is active before accessing or modifying a shared resource, potentially leading to race conditions and data…

Definition

What is CWE-414?

This vulnerability occurs when software fails to verify that a proper synchronization lock is active before accessing or modifying a shared resource, potentially leading to race conditions and data corruption.
In concurrent programming, multiple threads or processes often need to share access to the same data or system resource, such as a variable, file, or database entry. A missing lock check happens when a developer assumes a lock is already held or forgets to implement the verification step entirely. The code proceeds with a sensitive operation—like writing to a shared buffer or updating a configuration—without first confirming the necessary mutual exclusion lock is in place. This oversight breaks the intended synchronization, allowing other threads to interfere during the critical operation. The consequence is typically a race condition, where the final state of the resource depends on the unpredictable timing of thread execution. This can manifest as corrupted data, inconsistent application state, crashes, or security bypasses if the resource controls access permissions. To prevent this, developers must explicitly validate lock ownership at the entry point of any critical section. Using established synchronization primitives correctly and adopting thread-safe design patterns are essential to ensure that only one thread can modify the resource at a time.
Real-world impact

Real-world CVEs caused by CWE-414

  • Product does not properly check if a lock is present, allowing other attackers to access functionality.

How attackers exploit it

Step-by-step attacker path

  1. 1

    Identify a code path that handles untrusted input without validation.

  2. 2

    Craft a payload that exercises the unsafe behavior — injection, traversal, overflow, or logic abuse.

  3. 3

    Deliver the payload through a normal request and observe the application's reaction.

  4. 4

    Iterate until the response leaks data, executes attacker code, or escalates privileges.

Vulnerable code example

Vulnerable pseudo

MITRE has not published a code example for this CWE. The pattern below is illustrative — see Resources for canonical references.

Vulnerable pseudo
// Example pattern — see MITRE for the canonical references.
function handleRequest(input) {
  // Untrusted input flows directly into the sensitive sink.
  return executeUnsafe(input);
}
Secure code example

Secure pseudo

Secure pseudo
// Validate, sanitize, or use a safe API before reaching the sink.
function handleRequest(input) {
  const safe = validateAndEscape(input);
  return executeWithGuards(safe);
}
What changed: the unsafe sink is replaced (or the input is validated/escaped) so the same payload no longer triggers the weakness.
Prevention checklist

How to prevent CWE-414

  • Architecture and Design / Implementation Implement a reliable lock mechanism.
Detection signals

How to detect CWE-414

SAST High

Run static analysis (SAST) on the codebase looking for the unsafe pattern in the data flow.

DAST Moderate

Run dynamic application security testing against the live endpoint.

Runtime Moderate

Watch runtime logs for unusual exception traces, malformed input, or authorization bypass attempts.

Code review Moderate

Code review: flag any new code that handles input from this surface without using the validated framework helpers.

Plexicus auto-fix

Plexicus auto-detects CWE-414 and opens a fix PR in under 60 seconds.

Codex Remedium scans every commit, identifies this exact weakness, and ships a reviewer-ready pull request with the patch. No tickets. No hand-offs.

Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

What is CWE-414?

This vulnerability occurs when software fails to verify that a proper synchronization lock is active before accessing or modifying a shared resource, potentially leading to race conditions and data corruption.

How serious is CWE-414?

MITRE has not published a likelihood-of-exploit rating for this weakness. Treat it as medium-impact until your threat model proves otherwise.

What languages or platforms are affected by CWE-414?

MITRE has not specified affected platforms for this CWE — it can apply across most application stacks.

How can I prevent CWE-414?

Implement a reliable lock mechanism.

How does Plexicus detect and fix CWE-414?

Plexicus's SAST engine matches the data-flow signature for CWE-414 on every commit. When a match is found, our Codex Remedium agent opens a fix PR with the corrected code, tests, and a one-line summary for the reviewer.

Where can I learn more about CWE-414?

MITRE publishes the canonical definition at https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/414.html. You can also reference OWASP and NIST documentation for adjacent guidance.

Related weaknesses

Weaknesses related to CWE-414

CWE-667 Parent

Improper Locking

This vulnerability occurs when a program fails to correctly acquire or release a lock on a shared resource, such as a file, database…

CWE-1232 Sibling

Improper Lock Behavior After Power State Transition

This vulnerability occurs when a hardware lock bit, designed to protect critical system configuration registers, is improperly reset or…

CWE-1233 Sibling

Security-Sensitive Hardware Controls with Missing Lock Bit Protection

This vulnerability occurs when a hardware device uses a lock bit to protect critical configuration registers, but the lock fails to…

CWE-1234 Sibling

Hardware Internal or Debug Modes Allow Override of Locks

Hardware debug modes or internal states can bypass critical system lock protections, allowing unauthorized changes to device configuration.

CWE-412 Sibling

Unrestricted Externally Accessible Lock

This vulnerability occurs when a system correctly checks for a lock's existence, but an unauthorized external actor can control or…

CWE-413 Sibling

Improper Resource Locking

This vulnerability occurs when an application fails to properly lock a shared resource, such as a file or memory location, before…

CWE-609 Sibling

Double-Checked Locking

Double-checked locking is an insufficient synchronization pattern where a program checks a resource's state, acquires a lock, and checks…

CWE-764 Sibling

Multiple Locks of a Critical Resource

This vulnerability occurs when a critical resource, such as a file, data structure, or connection, is locked more times than the software…

CWE-765 Sibling

Multiple Unlocks of a Critical Resource

This vulnerability occurs when a critical resource, like a lock or semaphore, is unlocked more times than it was locked, putting the…

Ready when you are

Don't Let Security
Weigh You Down.

Stop choosing between AI velocity and security debt. Plexicus is the only platform that runs Vibe Coding Security and ASPM in parallel — one workflow, every codebase.